ChatGPT and Similar AI Are Not Going to Kill You, But Ignoring Them Might

Ray Kurzweil, a well-known futurist, recently spoke to journalists about his new book “The Singularity is Nearer.” He stresses that while AI isn’t something to fear, ignoring its potential could lead to significant setbacks.

The Future of Human Evolution

In “The Singularity is Nearer,” Kurzweil discusses how humans and AI will eventually merge. He predicts that by 2045, this fusion will be a major evolutionary step, freeing us from “biological limitations”. Brain-computer interfaces, such as those being developed by Neuralink, will play an important role in this transformation (yes, even outside memes). Kurzweil envisions a future where hightened human capabilities will be as transformative as a deaf person hearing a symphony for the first time.

Kurzweil is particularly excited about AI’s potential in the medical field. He believes that “AI-driven biosimulations” will give researchers options to unlock new data for vaccines, tailor treatments to individual patients, and even cure diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s. Kurzweil’s work with an AI chatbot modeled after his late father highlights how AI can preserve and improve human life.

Should We Embrace Technological Growth?

Kurzweil understands that some people find the idea of merging with AI unsettling. However, he insists that the exponential growth of technology supports his predictions. He cites the rapid development of large language models like ChatGPT as evidence of this ongoing progress. Kurzweil notes, highlighting that technological advancements often occur in leaps rather than gradual steps:

“While it is amazing to see the incredible progress with large language models over the past year and a half, I am not surprised.”

Kurzweil warns that anti-AI sentiment could delay advancements absolutely necessary for overcoming human suffering. He highlights the importance of improving human governance and social institutions so AI development is safe and beneficial and not the other way around. He writes:

“The best way to avoid destructive conflict in the future is to continue the advance of our ethical ideals.”

Don’t Fool Us – Community Response

In reaction to Kurzweil’s statements, the community was sceptical, but in general agreement on what was said. Similar sentiments were shared in regard to the whole ethics debate around AI. One person said:

“AI isn’t the problem. How our government/economy reacts to job automation is the problem. Which, so far, is to let rapid automation happen, let those affected sink, and let big business enjoy the desperation wages those people will accept after a few weeks in the bread line.”

Another major point of concern circled around the topic that most “people in charge” wish to leave out of professional interviews. The people who benefit most from AI surely didn’t suffer the unemployment it brought to thousands of people worldwide so how can they treat it as a threat?

“This would be easier to believe if most of what we’ve heard about it wasn’t from CEOs barley able to stop themselves from creaming their pants while gushing to an interviewer about how it had allowed them to lay off half their workforce”

Obviously, AI has the potential to make our lives better. But with all things great comes the time when people with more resources (read as: money) race to make it work to their advantage, almost never with others in mind. This leaves us to wonder: what AI is going to be like in the future?

A*Help Insights - sign up for our Newsletter

Sign up

Thanks for signing up!

Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.