Quick Overview
Media Bias Fact Check is an extensive media bias database, one of the most meticulous online. With over 9,000 media sources listed, it aims to help people identify bias and misinformation. The platform offers a search feature where users can check the bias of any news source by name or URL to navigate the overwhelming flood of information online.
| TOP services |  Updated February 2025 |
|---|---|
MediaBiasFactCheck
|
Read review |
Snopes.com
|
Read review |
Politifact.com
|
Read review |
FactCheck.org
|
Read review |
Washington Post
|
Read review |
MBFC provides a Media News Daily section with journalism-related news updates and Daily Vetted Fact Checks — compilations sourced from verified organizations only. These go through additional inspection to double-check their credibility. When MBFC disagrees with the original fact-checkers, they provide alternative ratings. In short, MBFC is a watchdog, “fact-checking the fact-checkers”, as they have put it, to keep an eye on bias in media.
Value for Money 37/40 
: Is MBFC Worth Your Time?
MBFC follows a structured methodology to rate sources. They incorporate diverse references including peer-reviewed research, journal articles, and reputable international media outlets. Evaluations are based on a mix of objective metrics and subjective analysis, following MBFC’s outlined methodology. The site acknowledges that said methodology is U.S.-centric, which is a plus to its transparency but knocks some points off. The database lists media sources from around the world, after all, and the regional context should be taken into account.
While MBFC provides brief contextual explanations for its ratings, it does not always trace false claims in detail. Some users might miss in-depth breakdowns. It’s harder for casual readers to follow the journey of a misleading claim from its origin to its correction. Then again, it’s not the goal of the site, and you can click through to the original article with more detailed information.
MBFC acknowledges that mistakes happen and offers a correction process. Users can report factual errors to the editor, and significant changes — like reclassifications of sources due to ownership changes — are logged on a dedicated page.
MBFC is 100% independent and does not accept funding from corporations, political parties, or advocacy groups. Revenue sources are disclosed on the site and include: third-party ads based on user search history and web content (35%), donations including PayPal and Patreon with tiers from $2 to $10 per month (5%), and paid memberships (65%). Users can become ad-free members with subscriptions ranging from $3 to $5 per month. While advertising makes up a significant portion of its revenue, MBFC argues that third-party ad selection helps maintain neutrality — understandable. The site doesn’t directly control which ads appear on it.
Founded in 2015, MBFC operates as an independent site dedicated to exposing media bias and misinformation. The website is run by Dave Van Zandt, along with a team of volunteers and contractors who research and maintain the database.
Overall Experience 50/60 : MBFC Makes Sure You Know Were Your Info Comes From
MBFC presents vetted fact-checks in a table format with visual indicators to highlight the legitimacy of claims. It is very easy for users to quickly assess the information’s credibility.
MBFC categorizes media sources by political bias, ranging from Extreme Left or Extreme Right to Least Biased. It also includes informative categories like Questionable, Conspiracy-Pseudoscience, and Satire. Additionally, separate sources (including individual politicians) are ranked on a vertical Factual Rating scale from Factual Reporting to Very Low. This layered classification might confuse you at first, but it provides a nuanced view of a source’s reliability and proves very handy once you get the gist of it.
MBFC integrates citations within the text rather than listing them separately at the end. Users can submit news sources for evaluation, but the website sets clear guidelines: sources must have a legitimate website and be related to politics. Facebook pages or groups without external verification are not accepted.
MBFC encourages community participation: you can suggest corrections and engage in discussions right under the articles in an open comment section, no matter how dead it is.
The Verdict
Media Bias Fact Check is a reliable fact-checking resource that provides structured bias ratings and factual accuracy assessments. Its independent funding model and clear methodology add to its credibility. While it offers strong verdict displays and transparent financing, some areas — like deeper misinformation tracing, design, and bibliographies — could improve. If you’re looking for a straightforward tool to check bias and media credibility, MBFC is worth using.
FAQ
| Why academichelp.net is a credible source of information: Stay curious with us. Academichelp.net has been a reliable educational resource since 2011, providing students with the latest news, assignment samples, and other valuable materials. Even with the extensive information we process, our quality remains consistent. Each team member has experience in education, allowing us to evaluate new sector offerings critically. Our reviews are up-to-date and relevant, with impartiality ensured by the A*Help score methodology from mystery shopping. We aren’t affiliated with any listed service providers. Our focus remains on providing our audience with reliable and unbiased data. |
Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.
Comments (0)
Welcome to A*Help comments!
We’re all about debate and discussion at A*Help.
We value the diverse opinions of users, so you may find points of view that you don’t agree with. And that’s cool. However, there are certain things we’re not OK with: attempts to manipulate our data in any way, for example, or the posting of discriminative, offensive, hateful, or disparaging material.