If we take a look at our world as an aggregate of social, political, cultural, and economical processes, each of which affects the entire complexity, trying to predict the scenarios of its further development and evolution (or degradation) will seem a waste of time and efforts. Nevertheless, one of the branches of modern science – specifically, the so-called futurology – aims at extrapolating the existing trends into the future in order to foresee its possible variants. By analyzing today’s agenda, one can come to certain conclusion about the nearest future that would be rather close to the truth. To do so, one should distinguish the most typical trends, and assume that they would continue in future. To our mind, such trends are global computerization and ecological pollution.
If we take a closer look at our civilization, we will notice that, as we see it today, it is based on the wide use of computers. Moreover, modern people spend a significant amount of time online, both for work and entertainment. Since we consume countless amounts of information, most part of which is visual, logically our eyes and brains will become larger to be able to cope with the constantly increasing amounts of data. Besides, according to Dr. Alan Kwan, a PhD in computational genomics from Washington University, genetic engineers of the future will seek to create people with even bigger heads and eyes to make them more suitable for life in the conditions of a distant future that is near 100000 years A.D. (FoxNews).
According to the philosophy of transhumanism, humankind will learn to move individuals’ minds into cybernetic organisms, thus eliminating the limitations of biological bodies, and literally achieving immortality (National Geographic). The ground for such transcending is already being prepared by the research on robotics, nanotechnologies, artificial intelligence, bioengineering and genetics.
Another trend typical in the modern world is the intense pollution of the environment. Ecological disasters happen too often, and their consequences are severe. Radioactive wastes, acid rains, carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases, freon, and other human-made factors may result into our planet turning into a desolated desert in about a hundred years. It is unlikely that our civilization will manage to change its way of functioning and exploiting the Earth’s resources, so the most obvious variant of the future is the constant struggle of humankind with the consequences of its own functioning. Technologies will be aimed at cleansing the atmosphere, decontaminating soil, and adjusting the ecosystem to the conditions when most species on the planet become extinct. On the other hand, emerging branches of futurism claim that we could already be using our technologies to clean up the Earth and create sustainable energy models for the future (IO9). This scenario assumes that humankind gives up the idea of the texnotronical and cybernetic civilization, and follows the path of living in harmony with the environment. In this case, bio-engineering and natural selection directed by humans would substitute as heavy industry and cybernetics.
The future is not pre-designed. It is an extremely flexible, abstract conception shaped by what humanity does at the present moment. There are numerous variants of how the future can develop, but taking into consideration modern trends, it is logical to assume that it will be greatly influenced by today’s global computerization and ecological issues. Humankind will most likely evolve into creatures with huge heads and eyes, akin to aliens in Roswell-47 images, or even become immortal due to transporting the human mind into robotic and cybernetic organisms. Deteriorating ecology will either make people struggle for survival in the future, or seek ways to live in harmony with the environment.
Roppolo, Michael. “Humans in 100,000 Years: What Will We Look Like?” Fox News. FOX News Network, 12 June 2013. Web. 11 July 2013. <http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/06/12/humans-in-100000-years-what-will-look-like/>.
Owen, James. “FUTURE HUMANS: Four Ways We May, or May Not, Evolve.” National Geographic. National Geographic Society, 24 Nov. 2009. Web. 11 July 2013. <http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/11/091124-origin-of-species-150-darwin-human-evolution.html>.
“7 Best-Case Scenarios for the Future of Humanity.” IO9. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 July 2013. <http://io9.com/5958479/7-best case-scenarios-for-the-future-of-humanity>.
Sign up and we’ll send you ebook of 1254 samples like this for free!
- Thesis statement and compare contrast essay asked by anonymous
- Gender stereotypes persuasive essay asked by anonymous
- Which of the following would best work as the title of an explanatory essay? asked by anonymous
- Divergent Novel Thesis Statement asked by anonymous
- What is a good thesis statement against euthanasia asked by