Quick Overview
Turnitin and Copyleaks are well-known names in the field of education, each serving distinct purposes. While many ponder “Is Turnitin legit?” due to its widespread use in academia, it is primarily recognized within academic circles. Copyleaks’ appeal, on the other hand, extends beyond students to include content creators and copywriters, among others. Both services are designed to verify the authenticity of work, but they cater to different settings.
TOP services | Updated January 2024 |
---|---|
AHelp Plagcheck
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Get free access |
Copyleaks
|
Read review |
Quillbot
|
Read review |
Originality AI
|
Read review |
PlagiarismCheck
|
Read review |
The main difference between Copyleaks vs Turnitin is a different approach to functioning as a plagiarism detection service. Indeed, both platforms offer similar features. While Copyleaks plagiarism checker sets its focus on accessibility and user-experience, Turnitin is more academically driven.
Our experts conducted a mystery shopping experiment to discover a tool that would meet education requirements and protect authenticity in writing. Today, we are comparing Copyleaks vs Turnitin to find out which tool can not only accept the challenge but also deliver superior educational support.
Copyleaks | Turnitin | |
Best fit for | From students to copywriters and content creators, Copyleaks is ready to help anyone with guarding the original work. | Turnitin can take care of securing integrity of essays, research papers, and theses in the academic landscape. |
A*Help Score | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 86/100 | ⭐⭐⭐ 72/100 |
Plagiarism Detection Quality | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Satisfactory plagiarism quality detection is what users can expect from Copyleaks. | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Titan in academic integrity, Turnitin can accurately spot any sign of plagiarism. |
Overall Experience | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Working with Copyleaks is easy and intuitive. More importantly, users do not have to wait long for their papers to get checked, since Copyleaks can scan any text in seconds. | ⭐⭐⭐ Turnitin was designed for academic purposes and to this day it serves its purpose right. The only downside is that this plagiarism checker is not for individual use. |
Value for Money | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Free trial and affordable paid subscription plans, great number of features and advanced tools – this and more users get from Copyleaks. | ⭐⭐⭐ With its focus in academia, Turnitin plans to remain in its niche. Hence, this plagiarism detector only offers features that are solely limited to this purpose. |
Comparing Value for Money: Turnitin vs Copyleaks
Copyleaks | Turnitin | |
Value For Money | 21/25 | 12/25 |
Features | 11 | 6 |
Sources | 6 | 6 |
Price & special offers | 4 | 0 |
Comparing Overall Experience: Copyleaks vs Turnitin plagiarism
Copyleaks | Turnitin | |
Overall Experience | 21/25 | 14/25 |
User Experience | 16 | 11 |
Sources | 5 | 3 |
Copyleaks vs Turnitin: Which Is Better for Plagiarism Detection?
Copyleaks | Turnitin | |
Plagiarism Detection | 44/50 | 46/50 |
Human-written text | 92.6% free from plagiarism | 100% free from plagiarism |
Internet sample | 100% of plagiarism detected | 99% of plagiarism detected |
AI paraphrase (2 texts) | 80.35% of plagiarism detected | 20% of plagiarism detected |
Replaced characters | 0% of plagiarism detected | 99% of plagiarism detected. Flagged letter replacements |
Winner
Ladies and gentlemen, the moment you’ve all been waiting for: the best plagiarism detector on all parameters is Copyleaks. It is accessible, versatile and accurate.
Main Specs
Copyleaks | Turnitin | |
> Features (to check text) | ||
Check files | ✅ | ✅ |
Insert text | ✅ | ❌ |
URL | ✅ | ❌ |
Scanned report | ✅ | ✅ |
Word limit | ✅ | ❌ |
Academic proofreading module (check citations and etc) | ✅ | ✅ |
Check for free/trial | ✅ | ❌ |
Number of free checks available | up to 1500-2000 | ❌ |
Spelling check | ❌ | ❌ |
Grammar check | ❌ | ❌ |
> Advanced features (to check text) | ||
Detect AI content | ✅ | ✅ |
Cross language search | ✅ | ✅ |
Text compare | ✅ | ❌ |
OCR scan | ✅ | ❌ |
> Sources | ||
Internet | ✅ | ✅ |
Current Batch Files (your own docs) | ✅ | ✅ |
Plagchecker’s database | ✅ | ✅ |
> Price & special offers | ||
Paid plans | Cheap | ❌ |
Discounts | ✅ | ❌ |
User experience | ||
Easy to use website | ✅ | ✅ |
Desktop version | ❌ | ❌ |
Trying before registration | ✅ | ❌ |
Browser extensions | ❌ | ❌ |
Account (do users have an account?) | ✅ | ✅ |
Time to check work | a couple of seconds | up to 1 minute |
Need email to register | ✅ | ✅ |
Need phone to register | ❌ | ❌ |
Third-party registration methods | ✅ | ❌ |
> Support | ||
Onboarding (how to use plagcheck) | ✅ | ❌ |
Guides | ✅ | ✅ |
Support chat | ✅ | ✅ |
> Payment | ||
Wallets (only Paypal) | ✅ | ❌ |
Visa | ✅ | ❌ |
MasterCard | ✅ | ❌ |
Amex | ✅ | ❌ |
Discover | ✅ | ❌ |
Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.
Comments (0)
Welcome to A*Help comments!
We’re all about debate and discussion at A*Help.
We value the diverse opinions of users, so you may find points of view that you don’t agree with. And that’s cool. However, there are certain things we’re not OK with: attempts to manipulate our data in any way, for example, or the posting of discriminative, offensive, hateful, or disparaging material.