Quick Overview
Turnitin and Scribbr can both serve students in plagiarism detection. While the former service was a last-century pioneer in this academic path, the latter has been on the market since 2012 and positioned itself as a guide in education writing. Indeed, Scribbr has a wider focus of help, while Turnitin specifically sticks to plagiarism checking.
TOP services | Updated January 2024 |
---|---|
AHelp Plagcheck
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Get free access |
Copyleaks
|
Read review |
Quillbot
|
Read review |
Originality AI
|
Read review |
PlagiarismCheck
|
Read review |
The main difference between Scribbr and Turnitin lies in their academic purposes, with some users raising concerns about a possible Turnitin scam in terms of data handling and privacy. Students are familiar with the latter, as many universities use this plagiarism checker to uphold academic integrity. Scribbr, on the other hand, is programmed to be an individual versatile helper for learners: scan their papers for plagiarism, create citations for papers, check their grammar, and more. The AcademicHelp team compared these two services to determine which is more efficient.
Our experts conducted a mystery shopping experiment to discover a tool that would meet education requirements and protect authenticity in writing, including a close look at the Scribbr plagiarism checker. Today, we are comparing Scribbr vs Turnitin to find out which tool can not only accept the challenge but also deliver superior educational support.
Scribbr | Turnitin | |
Best fit for | Scribbr is the best fit for individual use. | Turnitin can help students and teachers with scanning a great volume of information. |
A*Help Score | ⭐⭐ 61.6/100 | ⭐⭐⭐ 72/100 |
Plagiarism Detection Quality | ⭐⭐⭐ Scribbr proves to be a basic tool in plagiarism detection, but it can outstand its counterparts in correctly spotting AI-robotic paraphrases. | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Turnitin demonstrates effective performance in identifying plagiarism in texts, even those with various modifications. |
Overall Experience | ⭐⭐⭐ Scribbr is definitely a user-friendly service. It has everything an average student needs. But it could have been more accessible with a trial. | ⭐⭐⭐ Turnitin is widely recognized in academic circles for effectively fulfilling its specific role in this field. However, Turnitin could have scored higher if it was available for individual use as well. |
Value for Money | ⭐⭐⭐ Scribbr is a real toolkit with many useful tools for students. However, the plagiarism detector itself lacks features for more accurate results. | ⭐⭐⭐ Turnitin is designed exclusively for plagiarism checking in written works, and its features are specifically tailored to this purpose. |
Comparing Value for Money: Turnitin vs Scribbr
Scribbr | Turnitin | |
Value For Money | 16/25 | 12/25 |
Features | 8 | 6 |
Sources | 4 | 6 |
Trial & special offers | 4 | 0 |
Comparing Overall Experience: Scribbr vs Turnitin plagiarism
Scribbr | Turnitin | |
Overall Experience | 14/25 | 14/25 |
User Experience | 11 | 11 |
Sources | 3 | 3 |
Scribbr vs Turnitin: Which Is Better for Plagiarism Detection?
Scribbr | Turnitin | |
Plagiarism Detection | 31.6/50 | 46/50 |
Human-written text | 100% free from plagiarism | 100% free from plagiarism |
Internet sample | 25% of plagiarism detected | 99% of plagiarism detected |
AI paraphrase (2 texts) | 33% of plagiarism detected | 20% of plagiarism detected |
Replaced characters | 99% plagiarism detected | 99% of plagiarism detectedFlagged letter replacements |
Winner
Are you ready? All the scores have been tallied and the winner is – Turnitin. The service outweighs its counterpart by more accurate plagiarism detection results. However, it would have been a great advantage if this tool were available for individual use.
Main Specs
Scribbr | Turnitin | |
>Features (to check text) | ||
Check files | ✅ | ✅ |
Insert text | ❌ | ❌ |
URL | ❌ | ❌ |
Scanned report | ✅ | ✅ |
Word limit | ✅ | ❌ |
Academic proofreading module (check citations and etc) | ✅ | ✅ |
Check for free/trial | ❌ | ❌ |
Number of free checks available | ❌ | ❌ |
Spelling check | ✅ | ❌ |
Grammar check | ✅ | ❌ |
>Advanced features (to check text) | ||
Detect AI content | ❌ | ✅ |
Cross language search | ❌ | ✅ |
Text compare | ❌ | ❌ |
OCR scan | ❌ | ❌ |
>Sources | ||
Internet | ✅ | ✅ |
Current Batch Files (your own docs) | ✅ | ✅ |
Plagchecker’s database | ❌ | ✅ |
>Price & special offers | ||
Paid plans | Cheap | ❌ |
Discounts | ✅ | ❌ |
>User experience | ||
Easy to use website | ✅ | ✅ |
Desktop version | ❌ | ❌ |
Trying before registration | ❌ | ❌ |
Browser extensions | ❌ | ❌ |
Account (do users have an account?) | ✅ | ✅ |
Time to check work | up to 1 minute | up to 1 minute |
Need email to register | ✅ | ✅ |
Need phone to register | ❌ | ❌ |
Third-party registration methods | ✅ | ❌ |
>Support | ||
Onboarding (how to use plagcheck) | ❌ | ❌ |
Guides | ✅ | ✅ |
Support chat | ✅ | ✅ |
>Payment | ||
Wallets (only Paypal) | ✅ | ❌ |
Visa | ✅ | ❌ |
MasterCard | ✅ | ❌ |
Amex | ✅ | ❌ |
Discover | ✅ | ❌ |
Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.
Comments (0)
Welcome to A*Help comments!
We’re all about debate and discussion at A*Help.
We value the diverse opinions of users, so you may find points of view that you don’t agree with. And that’s cool. However, there are certain things we’re not OK with: attempts to manipulate our data in any way, for example, or the posting of discriminative, offensive, hateful, or disparaging material.