Smallseotools vs Turnitin

published December 1, 2023 - updated March 1, 2024

Quick Overview

Turnitin and Smallseotools can both serve students in plagiarism detection. While the former service was a last-century pioneer in this academic path, the latter has been on the market since 2010 and positioned itself as a versatile writing tool. Indeed, SmallSEOTools has a wider focus of help, while Turnitin specifically sticks to plagiarism checking.  

TOP services Our verdict AHelp Score 🔥 Updated January 2024
Service icon
AHelp Plagcheck
Best plagiarism detector 86.5/100 Get free access
Service icon
Best experience 86/100 Read review
Service icon
Best features 85.1/100 Read review
Service icon
Originality AI
Best free trial value 79.1/100 Read review
Service icon
Best price 78.6/100 Read review
Liked about Smallseotools
  • Decent plagiarism detection quality
  • Easy-to-use platform
Liked about Turnitin
  • Good plagiarism detection quality
  • Wide range of databases
An infographic with a short Smallseotools vs Turnitin comparison describing the ways these 2 services were tested and how the winner was picked

The main difference between SmallSEOTools and Turnitin lies in their core focuses: the former emphasizes user experience, while the latter concentrates on functionalities. The AcademicHelp team compared these two services to determine which is more efficient. 

Our experts conducted a mystery shopping experiment to discover a tool that would meet education requirements and protect authenticity in writing. Today, we are comparing Smallseotools vs Turnitin to find out which tool can not only accept the challenge but also deliver superior educational support.

Best fit forSmallSEOTools is the best fit for anyone who constantly works with text.Turnitin can help students and teachers with scanning a great volume of information. 
A*Help Score⭐⭐⭐
Plagiarism Detection Quality⭐⭐⭐⭐
Overall, SmallSEOTools demonstrate decent quality of plagiarism detection. However, there is room for improvement for detection of more intricate modifications. 
Turnitin demonstrates effective performance in identifying plagiarism in texts, even those with various modifications.
Overall Experience⭐⭐⭐ 
SmallSEOTools features a user-friendly interface and an intuitive website. However, the absence of a browser extension and a free trial detracts somewhat from its accessibility.
Turnitin is widely recognized in academic circles for effectively fulfilling its specific role in this field. However, Turnitin could have scored higher if it was available for individual use as well. 
Value for Money⭐⭐⭐⭐  
SmallSEOTools is a true Swiss-army knife for true wordsmiths. Users can scan their writing for plagiarism, check for grammar and spelling mistakes, and more. 
Turnitin is designed exclusively for plagiarism checking in written works, and its features are specifically tailored to this purpose.

Comparing Value for Money: Turnitin vs Smallseotools

A screenshot of Turnitin's main page
Turnitin main page
Value For Money18/2512/25
Price & special offers40

Comparing Overall Experience: Smallseotools vs Turnitin plagiarism

A screenshot of uploading a document at SmallSEOTools
Uploading a document at SmallSEOTools
Overall Experience15/2514/25
User Experience1311

Smallseotools vs Turnitin: Which Is Better for Plagiarism Detection?

A screenshot of plagiarism detection results at
Plagiarism detection results at TurnItIn (click to see a large image)
A screenshot of plagiarism detection results at Small SEO Tools
Plagiarism detection results at SmalSEOTools (click to see a large image)
Plagiarism Detection38.8/5046/50
Human-written text86% free from plagiarism100% free from plagiarism
Internet sample83% of plagiarism detected99% of plagiarism detected
AI paraphrase (2 texts)100% of plagiarism detected20% of plagiarism detected
Replaced characters0% of plagiarism detected99% of plagiarism detectedFlagged letter replacements


Ready for the results? After tallying all the scores, the verdict is in – Turnitin takes the lead. Its superior accuracy in plagiarism detection gives it an edge over its counterpart. However, its value would significantly increase if it were accessible for individual users.

Main Specs

> Features (to check text)  
Check files
Insert text
Scanned report
Word limit
Academic proofreading module (check citations and etc)
Check for free/trial
Number of free checks available
Spelling check
Grammar check
> Advanced features (to check text)  
Detect AI content
Cross language search
Text compare
OCR scan
Current Batch Files (your own docs)
Plagchecker’s database
> Price & special offers  
Paid plans
> User experience  
Easy to use website
Desktop version
Trying before registration
Browser extensions
Account (do users have an account?)
Time to check workup to 1 minuteup to 1 minute
Need email to register
Need phone to register
Third-party registration methods
Onboarding (how to use plagcheck)
Support chat
> Payment  
Wallets (only Paypal)

Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.

Comments (0)

Welcome to A*Help comments!

We’re all about debate and discussion at A*Help.

We value the diverse opinions of users, so you may find points of view that you don’t agree with. And that’s cool. However, there are certain things we’re not OK with: attempts to manipulate our data in any way, for example, or the posting of discriminative, offensive, hateful, or disparaging material.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Register | Lost your password?