Quick Overview
Passed AI leverages artificial intelligence’s capabilities to safeguard your content’s distinctiveness and genuineness. Ideally suited for teachers, scholars, and authors, it confirms the novelty of written materials, guaranteeing that each piece clears even the most challenging anti-plagiarism assessments with remarkable success – a result the best AI detector ought to have.
TOP services | Updated January 2024 |
---|---|
AHelp AI Detector
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Get free access |
TurnItIn
|
Read review |
CopyLeaks
|
Read review |
Winston AI
|
Read review |
Passed AI
|
Read review |
Passed AI’s Detection Accuracy —28.33/50 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Passed AI shows commendable accuracy in identifying fully AI-generated text, hitting the mark with a 100% detection rate. This accuracy continues with paraphrased content, although at a lower effectiveness, indicating the tool’s robust algorithm against complex text manipulations. However, its performance dips significantly when tasked with discerning purely human-written text, misattributing a considerable portion to AI. This suggests that while Passed AI is highly capable in certain areas, it may require adjustments to better recognize genuine human authorship without overestimating AI contributions.
AI Detection Results: 17/30
Human-written | AI-Generated | Paraphrased | |
Score | 2/10 | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Detection feedback | AI – 79% Not AI – 21% | AI – 100% | AI – 100% |
Passed AI’s Value for Money —13/25 ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Passed AI’s pricing strategy offers reasonable value, especially with its unique features like the Document Audit, History Report, and Replay Tool accessible in the Standard plan for $9.99 per month. The inclusion of a 5-day free trial and the ability to earn promotional codes over time enhance its appeal. Furthermore, the loyalty program, which allows users to become affiliates and earn a 20% commission, presents an attractive opportunity for engaged users. Despite these benefits, the absence of a completely free tier and the somewhat limited toolset compared to competitors could influence potential users’ decisions.
Is it possible to guarantee impeccable accuracy when detecting AI? Well, you can do it for a raw generation, but most detectors genuinely struggle against heavy human editor’s impact and smart paraphrasing. Furthermore, another question arises: if a student spends a lot of time editing generated material, should we count the paper as human-written instead? Learn more by reading the Human plus AI Detectors article.
Passed AI’s Overall Experience —17/25 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
The overall user experience with Passed AI is positive, marked by an aesthetic and easy-to-navigate interface. Registration is straightforward, requiring a Google account, with no phone number necessary, which simplifies the process. The tool’s website is user-friendly, offering quick processes and multi-language detection, although it works best in English. However, the lack of an instant chat option and limited payment methods slightly detract from the service’s accessibility and convenience.
Conclusion
Passed AI stands as a solid choice for users seeking reliable AI content detection tools, especially within educational environments. Its strengths in accurately identifying AI-generated and paraphrased texts are notable, although improvements in detecting purely human-authored content would enhance its appeal. The overall value for money, combined with a user-friendly experience and a flexible pricing model, makes Passed AI a service worth considering for those in need of its specific capabilities.
We always recommend using AI detectors in combination with a free AI checker essay to guarantee the most accurate results possible.
FAQ
Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.
Comments (3)
Welcome to A*Help comments!
We’re all about debate and discussion at A*Help.
We value the diverse opinions of users, so you may find points of view that you don’t agree with. And that’s cool. However, there are certain things we’re not OK with: attempts to manipulate our data in any way, for example, or the posting of discriminative, offensive, hateful, or disparaging material.
The fact that it’s trusted in education speaks volumes. Quite convincing to me
I appreciate the clear results. Makes it easy to understand where the content stands. But the inconsistent quality of detection for human-written content? Needs improvement.
The website experience is smooth and user-friendly. But why no instant chat support? Sometimes, I need answers ASAP!