The question of who makes a better language tutor – native speakers or high-level non-native speakers – is a contentious issue in language education. This controversy stems from the variable nature of language proficiency, teaching experience, and the nuances associated with the understanding and explanation of grammar. The dilemma largely centres around whether a high-level non-native speaker (C1 level) is equipped to tutor beginner to low-intermediate students, or if a higher proficiency level (C2) or even native fluency is necessary for effective tutoring.

Woman shrugging
✅ AI Essay Writer ✅ AI Detector ✅ Plagchecker ✅ Paraphraser
✅ Summarizer ✅ Citation Generator

Key Takeaways:

  • Non-native tutors use personal learning experiences to teach complex language aspects effectively.
  • There’s debate on whether high proficiency or native fluency is needed for non-native tutors.
  • Native tutors offer authentic experiences but their teaching effectiveness varies based on skills and experience.

Advantages and Limitations

There is a common perception among learners that non-native tutors often outperform their native counterparts. Many attribute this to the unique perspective that non-native tutors bring as learners themselves. They have walked the same path and overcome similar obstacles as their students, therefore, they are equipped to explain grammar intricacies, language details, and provide practical learning tips that native speakers might overlook.

Quotes from language learners support this idea:

“The ideal tutor is someone who shares one’s native language and learned the target language to a high level,” and “It could bring pronunciation tips that a native may not be able to articulate and other tips that would be helpful coming from another non-native speaker.”

However, there is a split opinion regarding the required proficiency level for non-native tutors. Some believe a C1 level is enough to teach beginner to low-intermediate students, while others argue that a C1 level is still a learner’s level, and they may pass on their mistakes to new learners. One of the comments reflects this dichotomy:

“C1 means: ‘you have in-depth knowledge of the language and you are an experienced user…’ but it would be malpractice for me to claim I am qualified to ‘teach’ French as the OP asks in any sense of the word.”

Strengths and Challenges

In the discussion around native tutors, a strong emphasis is put on their unconscious fluency, understanding of the cultural context, and the authenticity they bring to language learning. Particularly for advanced learners, native speakers are considered irreplaceable as they can help students achieve a ‘feeling’ for the language and refine their understanding of colloquial usage and intonation.

Several comments highlight these points:

“For language practice, you can’t beat native speakers. For language TEACHING you can’t beat someone of your native tongue who has mastered the language you’re learning,” and “Native tutors are great when it comes to conversation, language, cadence, and immersion.”

However, the same native speakers may struggle when it comes to teaching beginners due to a lack of experience learning the language and explaining its basic concepts. As one user commented:

“Native speakers are generally not that good at realizing how to explain their language and have no experience learning it.”

Therefore, the effectiveness of native tutors largely depends on their teaching skills and experience in addition to their language proficiency.

How Non-Native Tutors Facilitate Communication

Breaking language barriers is an essential aspect of today’s global communication, and non-native language tutors play a significant role in this process. They offer a unique perspective, having grappled with the same language obstacles their students face, thereby providing insightful solutions to surmount these challenges. For instance, a non-native English tutor from China might have firsthand experience in navigating the complexity of English articles – a concept non-existent in Chinese language. They could provide targeted strategies, like mnemonic devices or context-based rules, to help Chinese students understand and remember when to use ‘a’, ‘an’, and ‘the’ correctly.

Native vs. Non-native Teachers: Who are better?

Moreover, non-native tutors are often more adept at explaining grammar intricacies and language rules, since they’ve learned them systematically. A Brazilian teaching Portuguese, for instance, could explain the nuances of using the future subjunctive tense in a way that is relatable and comprehensible to English speakers, as it’s a tense not used in English.

Additionally, non-native tutors can bridge cultural gaps by drawing parallels between the students’ native culture and the target language culture. For instance, a Japanese tutor who is a native Spanish speaker could use the concept of ‘Uchi-Soto,’ a societal norm in Japan distinguishing between in-group (uchi) and out-group (soto), to explain the complex honorific system in Japanese, drawing parallels with formal and informal modes of address in Spanish.

In these ways, non-native tutors significantly contribute to breaking language barriers, facilitating communication, and fostering global understanding.


Opt out or Contact us anytime. See our Privacy Notice

Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.

Comments (0)

Welcome to A*Help comments!

We’re all about debate and discussion at A*Help.

We value the diverse opinions of users, so you may find points of view that you don’t agree with. And that’s cool. However, there are certain things we’re not OK with: attempts to manipulate our data in any way, for example, or the posting of discriminative, offensive, hateful, or disparaging material.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Register | Lost your password?