Quick Overview
Content at Scale is a company that offers a number of writing tools and an enhanced AI Detector. This detector is designed to differentiate between human-generated content generated by sophisticated AI models, such as ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard. The AI text detector can inspect up to 25,000 characters in a single analysis, providing a detailed examination and transparent ratings based on billions of individual data pages and words across multiple languages. The service is among the pioneers in AI content detection and is offered as one of the best AI detectors as a free tool. But does it live up to the claims?
| TOP services |  Updated January 2024 |
|---|---|
AHelp AI Detector
 |
Get free access |
TurnItIn
|
Read review |
CopyLeaks
|
Read review |
Winston AI
|
Read review |
Passed AI
|
Read review |
Content at Scale’s Detection Accuracy —16.67/50
We discovered that Content At Scale AI content detection is moderately effective, particularly in identifying paraphrased texts, with a score of 5/10. However, its performance is less impressive when it comes to distinguishing between purely AI-generated (1/10) and completely human-written texts (4/10). This suggests that while it can handle mixed authorship reasonably well, it struggles with extreme ends of the AI-human authorship spectrum. Its broad support for different AI technologies, including newer models like Claude and Gemini, is commendable, but this does not fully translate into high accuracy in detection.
AI Detection Results: 10/30
| Human-written | AI-Generated | Paraphrased | |
| Score | 4/10 | 1/10 | 5/10 |
| Detection feedback | 54% unclear it is AI | 88% highly likely to be human | 53% unclear it is AI |
Content at Scale’s Value for Money —15/25
Content At Scale pricing policies are pretty standard and offer an average value for money. It provides a free version with a 2,500-character limit and a PRO version priced at $49/month, which includes an AI checker and generative AI. The loyalty program, offering a 15% recurring commission for referrals, is an attractive feature for promoting user engagement. However, in our opinion the absence of a free trial and limited payment options may deter some potential users. The tool seems reasonably priced for its offered features, though the accuracy issues might affect its overall appeal.
Content at Scale’s Overall Experience —16/25
The overall user experience based on Content At Scale reviews is fairly positive. The platform does not require registration or personal accounts, making it easily accessible. The website is user-friendly and quick to navigate, although it does not support multi-language detection or printable reports. Support is limited to leaving messages, a blog, and FAQs, with no options for instant chat or phone assistance. These factors combined make ContentAtScale a user-friendly tool, but one that might not meet the needs of users looking for in-depth support or advanced features.
FAQ
Content at Scale’s Specs
| > TECH DETECTION | |
| GPT-3.5 |  |
| GPT-4 | |
| ChatGPT | |
| Bard | |
| Human | |
| Human + AI | |
| Trusted in education | |
| > TOOLS | |
| API integration | |
| Browser extension (Chrome) |  |
| MS Word | |
| Addit. on-board tools | |
| > DETECTION OPTIONS | |
| files (pdf, word) | |
| simple text (copy-paste) | |
| URL | |
| Code files | |
| Batch files upload | |
| > PRICING PLANS & LIMITS | |
| Free | |
| Free trial | |
| Discounts | n/a |
| Limits | 25000 characters at a time |
| Loyalty | Get 15% recurring commission on any of our products. This means $75 to $300 per month for each referral! |
| > REGISTRATION | |
| Required | |
| Third-party sign in options | |
| Needs phone number | |
| Personal account | |
| > WEBSITE EXPERIENCE | |
| Aesthetic Interface | |
| Easy-to-use | |
| Quick process | |
| Multi-language detection | n/a |
| Printable report | |
| Clear results | |
| > SUPPORT | |
| Leave a message | |
| Instant chat | |
| Phone | |
| Social media channels | |
| Blog | |
| FAQ and guides | |
| Why academichelp.net is a credible source of information: Stay curious with us. Academichelp.net has been a reliable educational resource since 2011, providing students with the latest news, assignment samples, and other valuable materials. Even with the extensive information we process, our quality remains consistent. Each team member has experience in education, allowing us to evaluate new sector offerings critically. Our reviews are up-to-date and relevant, with impartiality ensured by the A*Help score methodology from mystery shopping. We aren’t affiliated with any listed service providers. Our focus remains on providing our audience with reliable and unbiased data. |
Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.
Comments (14)
Welcome to A*Help comments!
We’re all about debate and discussion at A*Help.
We value the diverse opinions of users, so you may find points of view that you don’t agree with. And that’s cool. However, there are certain things we’re not OK with: attempts to manipulate our data in any way, for example, or the posting of discriminative, offensive, hateful, or disparaging material.
The overall experience doesn’t seem too shabby but there are definitely other tools out there that cater more to students and have better detection accuracy.
How it managed to get only a
for AI-Generated detection when that’s its main selling point is beyond me. 
Yeah, the file upload thing is a bummer. Would’ve made life easier for essays and stuff. But the AI detection is sorta neat. Detecting GPT-4 and Bard sounds like a challenge.
It’s free so I might give it a try. However, the review points out some clear shortfalls. But hey, who can argue with free, right?
Right? The price of free does make it tempting to at least try. Just hope it won’t be a waste of time.
Their tech detection scored a perfect 5/5 though. That’s impressive. But it’s sad to see it doesn’t do well with AI-generated content detection. Seems like a mixed bag.
The website experience was decent but not mind-blowing. And being mainly designed for businesses is a downside for us students. Some more college related tools there wouldn’t hurt
I wonder how it performs when you throw some ChatGPT content at it.
With 54% unclear on AI, makes you think.
Totally agree. The results on the detection feedback make me skeptical. Like, how effective is this really if it’s unclear half the time?
As a non-native speaker, the multilingual support sounds promising. 25,000 characters at once is more than enough? Who writes that much?
Lmao, got a 1/5 on available tools. That’s like getting a D in your exams.
Maybe they should re-evaluate what they’re offering.
Ha! That’s a good one. But seriously, they claim to differentiate between human-generated content and AI-generated stuff, yet they got only one star on AI-generated. Oh, the irony!
I gave it a spin, and the process was really quick! Though, I wish it was more geared towards students and not just businesses.
Honestly, this Content at Scale tool seems kinda cool, especially with the whole AI detection thing. But, what’s with not supporting file uploads?