Quetext VS Grammarly

🔥 published May 3, 2024 - updated May 8, 2024

Quick Overview

Recently we put two popular plagiarism checkers, Quetext and Grammarly, through their paces to determine how well they spot copied content across various documents. Our test involved analyzing a human-written text, a document found online, an essay paraphrased with AI, and text with manually modified characters. Quetext excelled at detecting straightforward plagiarism from internet sources, with a high success rate in standard plagiarism checks. In contrast, Grammarly showed unparalleled strength in ensuring texts are completely original, especially with human-written content, despite its struggles with more complex tasks like detecting AI-paraphrased material.

Liked about Quetext
  • Budget-friendly pricing
  • Basic features
  • Spelling and grammar check
Liked about Grammarly
  • Many basic features
  • Desktop app
  • Instant results
TOP services Our verdict A*Help Score 🔥 Updated January 2024
Service icon
AHelp Plagcheck
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Best plagiarism detector 86.5/100 Get free access
Service icon
Copyleaks
Best experience 86/100 Read review
Service icon
Quillbot
Best features 85.1/100 Read review
Service icon
Originality AI
Best free trial value 79.1/100 Read review
Service icon
PlagiarismCheck
Best price 78.6/100 Read review
QuetextGrammarly
Best fit forQuetext is the best choice for accurately checking your work for plagiarism.Grammarly can be your preferred option if you require a high-quality grammar tool in addition to a basic plagiarism checker.
A*Help Score⭐⭐⭐⭐
78.1/100
⭐⭐⭐⭐
53.5/100
Checking Quality⭐⭐⭐⭐
Quetext accurately identifies plagiarism in your documents and shows the source of borrowed material. Also, the tool unmistakably delivers negative conclusions regarding plagiarism in fully authored texts.
⭐⭐⭐
Grammarly accurately recognizes entirely unique texts as plagiarism-free. However, when it comes to documents containing actual plagiarism, the tool displays considerable inaccuracies in its check results.
Overall Experience⭐⭐⭐⭐
Working with the tool is quick and hassle-free. A browser extension is available, but no standalone desktop app is offered.
⭐⭐⭐⭐
You can use the anti-plagiarism check function only from your personal account since it’s not accessible through the browser extension. Other than that, Grammarly is a simple and pleasant service to work with. 
Value for Money⭐⭐⭐⭐
Quetext implements a fair pricing strategy, providing a fixed limit of free checks. For clients requiring frequent usage or larger documents, there’s an affordable subscription option along with occasional discounts.
⭐⭐⭐⭐
The company offers users to choose from several paid subscriptions ranging from $12 to $30 per month

Plagiarism Detection Quality: Quetext Vs Grammarly

Quetext scored 41.1/50 for plagiarism detection, demonstrating robust performance, especially in identifying copied content from the internet (98% detected). However, it struggled with AI-paraphrased content and modified texts, detecting only 22.5% and 0% respectively.

Grammarly scored significantly lower overall at 21.5/100. While it perfectly detected plagiarism in human-generated text (100% free), it was notably weak in spotting internet-sourced and AI-paraphrased plagiarism, detecting merely 3% and 19.5%, respectively. Its ability to recognize modified characters was non-existent, similar to Quetext.

Clearly, Quetext outperforms Grammarly in general plagiarism detection, except in handling purely original human text where Grammarly leads.

Paper’s sourceQuetext
41.1
Grammarly
21.5/50
✍️ Written from scratch
🔍 Found online & submitted
🤖 AI-paraphrased
🔠 Manually modified text from the internet

Comparing Value for Money: Quetext Vs Grammarly

Quetext presents a balanced value package regarding feature availability and cost-effectiveness. It scores well with basic features like file uploads, text insertion, spelling, and grammar checks, which are essential for a thorough plagiarism review. Its distinguishing feature is the academic proofreading module, which enhances its appeal to academic users who need to check citations alongside plagiarism. Advanced features are somewhat lacking though. For example, it does not support cross-language searches or AI content detection, which as we believe, limits its usefulness in certain contexts or user scenarios. Nevertheless, Quetext offers a competitive edge with its pricing. The free plan includes free checks for up to 500 words, while the premium package costs a reasonable $9.60 per month with almost unlimited plagiarism checking and plenty of other useful things. This plan should be particularly appealing for heavy users who need to check lengthy papers without incurring high costs.

A screenshot of pricing plans at Quetext
Pricing plans at Quetext (click to see a large image)

Grammarly, on the other hand, offers fewer features for plagiarism checking. It doesn’t have anything like the academic module, which can be a significant drawback for users with specific educational purposes. Also features like file uploads and cross-language search aren’t supported, which restricts its functionality compared to Quetext. However, Grammarly’s real strength lies in its spelling and grammar check features, widely regarded as some of the best in the industry, which adds substantial value for users looking for a comprehensive writing tool. Grammarly’s pricing is tiered, ranging from $12 monthly for an annual subscription to $30 for a monthly plan, making it more expensive than Quetext, especially for users who prefer short-term commitments.

A screenshot of pricing plans at Grammarly
Pricing plans at Grammarly (click to see a large image)

QuetextGrammarly
Free Trial
Monthly Plan$8.80$12
Annual Billing$115.20$144

Overall, while Grammarly offers superior language tools, Quetext provides better overall plagiarism-checking capabilities and more cost-effective plans for users primarily interested in plagiarism detection.

Comparing Overall Experience: Quetext Vs Grammarly

Quetext provides a fine user experience with its easy-to-use website and efficient browser extensions. It’s quick and productive online, but those of you who prefer standalone applications will be disappointed. The registration process, by the way, is simple and requires only an email. Quetext’s checking time, which takes up to a minute, is reasonable but might feel slow for users checking large documents or working under time constraints. The platform’s support is robust, featuring onboarding guidance, detailed usage guides, and a responsive support chat, therefore no matter how you prefer to be helped, assistance is always available.

Plagiarism reports at Quetext
Plagiarism reports at Quetext (click to see a large image)

Grammarly offers an equally intuitive user experience but is more advanced with the availability of a desktop application, catering to users who prefer not to work within a browser. This feature, combined with its rapid checking capabilities—processing texts in just a few seconds—positions Grammarly as the more efficient choice for users who value speed. However, it lacks a browser extension for plagiarism checking, which can limit its accessibility and ease of use compared to Quetext. While Grammarly also requires only an email for registration and offers third-party registration options, its support services are less comprehensive, lacking a support chat. We all understand that immediate help is sometimes vital.

Plagiarism check results at Grammarly
Plagiarism check results at Grammarly (click to see a large image)

In summary, both tools offer distinct advantages in the overall experience. Quetext delivers a solid web-based experience with excellent support, making it reliable for users who prioritize thorough support and a good web interface. Grammarly, with its faster processing and desktop availability, appeals to those who value speed and flexibility in usage. The choice between the two will largely depend on the user’s specific needs regarding speed, platform preference, and support availability.

The Verdict

Both Quetext and Grammarly have their strengths and weaknesses. Quetext stands out in the quality of checks and cost-effectiveness, making it a strong candidate for those prioritizing extensive plagiarism detection and affordability. Grammarly shines in handling original human-written content and offers a better overall user experience, suitable for users who value speed and desktop availability. Each tool serves different needs, and the choice between them would depend on specific user priorities in plagiarism detection features and usability.

Main Specs: Quetext Vs Grammarly

> Features QuetextGrammarly
Check files
Insert text
URL
Receive report
Word limit
Academic proofreading module (check citations and etc)
Trial
Number of free words to checkup to 500
Spelling check
Grammar check
> Advanced features  
Detect AI content
Cross language search
Text compare
OCR scan
> Sources 
Internet
Current Batch Files (your own docs)
Plagchecker’s database
> Price & special offers 
Paid plansCheapAffordable
Discounts
> Accessibility 
Easy to use website
Desktop version
Trying before registration
Browser extensions
Account (do users have an account?)
Time to check workup to 1 minutea couple of seconds
Need email to register
Need phone to register
Third-party registration methods

Follow us on Reddit for more insights and updates.

Comments (0)

Welcome to A*Help comments!

We’re all about debate and discussion at A*Help.

We value the diverse opinions of users, so you may find points of view that you don’t agree with. And that’s cool. However, there are certain things we’re not OK with: attempts to manipulate our data in any way, for example, or the posting of discriminative, offensive, hateful, or disparaging material.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Login

Register | Lost your password?